The Expat Financial Planning Checklist: How to Sense Check Your Position Before You Move or Retire
- Thomas Sleep
- Jul 1
- 5 min read
Updated: 6 hours ago
Most expats believe they are “reasonably organised”.
They have offshore accounts.
They have investments.
They have pensions.
They file tax returns when required.
What they usually have not done is test whether their financial lives would survive exposure to change.
Expat financial planning does not fail because people forget to open accounts or save money. It fails because decisions made years apart, under different assumptions, quietly become incompatible.
This article is designed to expose that incompatibility.
Not at a surface level, but at the level where outcomes become locked in.
This Is Not An Expat Financial Planning Checklist of Tasks; It Is a Failure Analysis
A standard checklist asks: “Have you done X?”
A helpful expat financial planning checklist asks: “What breaks if X happens?”
The difference matters.
As set out in What Good Expat Financial Planning Actually Looks Like in 2025, sound planning is not about accumulation. It is about resilience to sequencing risk, jurisdictional change, and loss of optionality.
Everything below should be read through that lens.
1. Residency: Where Your Plan Is Most Likely to Collapse First
Most expats can tell you where they are resident today. Very few can explain why their plan still works if it changes earlier, later, or more messily than expected.
Stress test this properly:
If you became a UK resident six months earlier than planned, which assets would immediately become taxable?
Which past decisions would suddenly be judged under UK rules rather than overseas ones?
Which transactions would you regret having executed too early?
Which structures would become expensive to unwind?
Failure mode:
Residency changes before assets are repositioned.
Consequence:
Capital gains, income tax, and reporting obligations crystallise simultaneously, removing sequencing flexibility.
This is where expats discover too late that they planned for a date, not a range of outcomes.
2. Historic Decisions: The Things You Assume Are “Done” but Aren’t
Every long-term expat carries historic decisions that feel settled but are not.
Old offshore accounts.
Structures created under outdated assumptions.
Interrogate them:
If you had to justify why each major structure exists today, would the rationale still hold?
Were these decisions made to solve a permanent problem or a temporary one?
What assumptions were valid at the time but are no longer true now?
Which of these decisions becomes painful if revisited under a different tax regime?
Failure mode:
Legacy structures remain untouched because “nothing has gone wrong”.
Consequence:
When change finally forces a review, restructuring triggers tax that could have been avoided years earlier.
In a world of increasing data connectivity, history does not decay quietly. It compounds.
3. Visibility: Can Your Planning Survive Being Understood?
This is the section most expats subconsciously avoid.
Ask yourself:
If all my arrangements were viewed together, would they look coherent?
Do they clearly align with my stated intentions, or do they look opportunistic?
Could intent be misread because decisions were never reviewed or documented?
Am I relying on things being overlooked rather than logically defensible?
As discussed in HMRC and Expats in 2025: Why Offshore Wealth Is More Visible Than Ever, HMRC increasingly analyses patterns rather than transactions.
Failure mode:
Planning relies on opacity rather than logic.
Consequence:
When circumstances change, interpretation replaces certainty, and interpretation rarely favours the taxpayer.
Good planning does not fear visibility. It is designed for it.
4. Sequencing: The Point of No Return Most Expats Miss
This is the core of the expat planning problem.
List the decisions in your financial life that are irreversible:
selling certain assets
drawing pension benefits
restructuring offshore holdings
Now ask:
Do I know the correct order in which these should happen?
Do I know which decisions eliminate future options?
Have I identified decisions that should only occur after residency is certain?
Am I assuming sequencing can be fixed retrospectively?
Failure mode:
Decisions are taken in a convenient order, not a strategic one.
Consequence:
Tax outcomes become locked in years earlier than necessary.
This is exactly how the expat tax trap described in The Expat Tax Trap: Why Doing Nothing After the UK Budget Can Be the Most Expensive Decision forms. Not through ignorance, but through delay.
5. Income: When Flexibility Quietly Disappears
Accumulation feels productive. Income feels distant.
That is why many expats fail to stress-test their income sources and deliveries.
Ask yourself:
Which income sources are forced, and which are controllable?
What happens if income is needed sooner than expected?
What happens if income is needed later?
Which structures force withdrawals regardless of tax timing?
Failure mode:
Income strategy is implicit rather than engineered.
Consequence:
Well-performing assets become tax inefficient at the worst possible moment.
A plan that only works if income is taken at a specific time is not flexible; it is fragile.
6. Concentration: The Risk You Don’t See Until It Hits
Expat concentration risk is rarely obvious.
It often looks like:
heavy reliance on one country’s tax rules
dependence on one property market
exposure to one currency at the point income is needed
multiple decisions tied to the same assumption holding
Ask yourself:
What single change would cause the most damage to my plan?
How many parts of my strategy depend on that not happening?
Have I mistaken familiarity for diversification?
Failure mode:
Planning depends on one jurisdiction behaving as expected.
Consequence:
A single policy or market shift cascades through the entire plan.
7. Governance: Why “Review” Is the Wrong Word
Most expats say they “review” their finances. What they usually mean is that they look at balances.
Real governance asks:
when assumptions were last challenged
which events force a re-evaluation
who is responsible for spotting sequencing risk
how decisions are revisited as life changes
Failure mode:
Review is reactive.
Consequence:
Change is dealt with under time pressure, not strategically.
What This Checklist Is Actually Diagnosing
This checklist is not asking whether you are organised.
It is asking whether your planning:
survives change
preserves optionality
controls timing
and avoids irreversible mistakes
If answering these questions was difficult, that does not reflect intelligence. It reflects how complex expat planning can be when done correctly.
Turning Diagnosis Into Control
Diagnosis without prioritisation leads to paralysis.
Once gaps are visible, the real question becomes:
“What do I fix first without breaking something else?”
That is where most expats stall.
In From Checklist to Action: How Expats Should Prioritise Financial Decisions, I set out a prioritisation framework that shows how to move from insight to action without urgency, panic, or accidental tax triggers.
It is about sequencing, not speed.
Want to test this properly?
Most expats can sense that something is misaligned but cannot quantify where the real risk sits. The difference between benign imperfections and structural problems is rarely obvious without experience.
Start with a conversation. Book a discovery call with My Intelligent Investor and get clear on where you stand, what’s changing, and what you can do about it. Let’s build a strategy that turns market complexity into opportunity.
Get in Touch Today:
📞 Call Us: 00971 (0) 58 579 4523
📧 Email Us: info@myintelligentinvestor.com
📅 Book a Meeting Directly:
Looking for more insights? Check out our other insights for expert tips and advice that may be helpful.
Comments